Articles by wilso952

You are cordially invited… II

Previously we shared in invitation to a talk related to a past exhibit. This month’s invitation offers an evening of scenic design, vaudeville, a light supper and dancing in celebration of a past exhibit…

Web_WAM_TwinCityScenic_02.jpgWeb_WAM_TwinCityScenic_01.jpg

In the mid-80s, the University acquired the “Twin City Scenic Collection,” which consisted of over a thousand renderings, sketches and models from the Twin City Scenic company of Minneapolis. As indicated by a U of M press release from 1985 (Digital Conservancy) former Twin City Scenic Studio president, W.R. Brown, brought the collection to the University. The studio was established in 1896 and was located in the Bijou Theatre. From vaudeville to the circus, this theatre contributed greatly to the Twin Cities theatre scene. The exhibit, and related programming, conducted in 1987, brought to light this local highlight.


Federal Students

In the early years of the Gallery, personnel consisted of the curator, Ruth Lawrence, and to those who are referred to in the archival records as, “federal students.” This title is written in pencil on the back of a photograph in Box 3:

Web_WAM_003_StaffPhotographs_FederalStudents_2.jpg

The Federal Students employed at the Gallery were part of the National Youth Administration (NYA), a division under the Works Progress Administration that provided work-study income to students and other financial support to youth in the years that followed the Great Depression.

Web_FedStudents_03.jpgBox 101 contains a folder titled, “Gallery Procedures” in which resides the document, “Instructions to Federal Students.” From the instructions, we learn of what the duties of the Federal Students were, “As noted above, the departments with which you will be mainly concerned are (2) Art Reference Room, (4) the Fine Arts Room, (11) the Galleries.

In the foreword to a bound gallery report compiled in 1939, Ruth Lawrence provides further description of the “federal students,”

“The N.Y.A. students were wholly untrained and those assigned often came to us at first disinterested in the work, and great deal of patience was needed in training them for the tasks they were to do… “

Other included documentation reveals the position requests that were made to the Federal Student Work Project in 1936-1937:

Secretarial – shorthand typing
poster work – art training-printing
journalism – handle publicity work
take charge of print room and art books, print file – graduate students in art if possible, afternoons free
collect materials on artists for their works for loan print collections – must have fine arts training
finish and make picture frames – carpentering and painting, packing and unpacking for gallery and lifting hanging exhibitions
guard duty – interest in art, so as to answer questions in gallery, two may be women for fine art room.

An example of the duties performed by federal students is found on a Federal Student Daily Report,

Web_WPA1939_19.jpg

In the same 1939 gallery report, Ruth reflected,

“…The task was tremendous and it was fraught by almost insurmountable hazards due to the inaccurateness caused by ignorance of the material handled and the fact that the students were attempting tasks which required trained skill and knowledge. It was only through patient and laborious instruction that they could carry on with any degree of efficiency. However, without the excellent cooperation and enthusiasm of these students and a determination to build the Gallery into a fine thing, this task would have been hopeless.”

Web_WAM_003_StaffPhotographs_FederalStudents_1.jpg


Fine Arts Room

In building upon President Lotus Coffman’s initial intentions with the “fine arts experiment” at the University, in the early years the Gallery provided not only exhibition and art rental in order to improve the “cultural aspects” of the student population, but also a room of respite in order for students to be exposed to art and culture.

Documentation included in Box 101, which includes Ruth Lawrence’s early correspondence and administrative papers, creates a picture of what the “Fine Arts Room” was like and the processes followed to maintain it.

Web_UA_Photos_FineArts_1.jpg Web_UA_Photos_FineArts_5.jpg

Georgia O’Keeffe: Oak Leaves, Pink and Grey

The Room was featured in a 1935 edition of School and Society in an article titled, “An Experimental Arts Room at Minnesota,” prompting an inquiry to Ruth Lawrence from a reader, C.H. Bennett. Lawrence, responding to the inquiry, provides an additional description of the room’s atmosphere and design, which also compliments the black and white photographs contained in the photograph collection of the University Archives:

Web_UA_Photos_FineArts_3.jpg Web_UA_Photos_FineArts_4.jpg

“The room is modern in design. A blue and off white color scheme is carried throughout, two walls blue and two walls and the ceiling off white. The furniture is all modern; the lines are horizontal. The windows have blue venetian blinds and heavy blue drapes which drop to the floor. At one end of the room is an alcove, indirectly lighted, in which we exhibit one masterpiece of modern painting. The corner of the opposite wall is mirrored in such a way as to afford a transition from the blue wall to the off white one. Besides the lighting in the alcove there are many modern designed lamps to give that added touch that makes the room homelike.”

“Everyone seems to feel that the room is fulfilling adequately the hope that it will become an art sanctuary. I believe an incident which happened when we opened the room will illustrate this. The evening before the opening reception, I was sitting in the room, giving it a last appraisal and criticism, when one of my employees came in to ask me a question. He progressed to the center of the room, stood still a moment, and then, with a hasty apology, carefully carried his cigarette to the door, and stamped it out saying that it was nothing short of sacrilidge to smoke there.”

The care and upkeep of the Room was tasked to the federal student workers employed at the Gallery. In “Instructions to Federal Students,” a complete description of the maintenance of the room is described,

 

“The Fine Arts Room is to be cleaned thoroughly 3 times a week. By cleaning “thoroughly” we mean that the rug is to be vacuumed, the venetian blinds dusted, the furniture dusted, the mirrors washed, the metal grills polished, etc. Every day however, the cabinets are to be dusted and should the rug need vacuuming, that is to be done also. We shall try to arrange it so that it is the duty of certain girls to do cleaning, but it is every girl’s responsibility to see that the room is in good shape at all time.”

 

The instructions also describe the behaviors to follow within the Room, which was monitored by “hostesses,” “Hostesses are not to study while they are on duty in this room. They are to sit quietly, reading the art books and magazines and taking the attendance. Visitors are not to smoke, study, or converse in loud tones. Also, lounging or napping on the part of either the visitors or hostesses is not permitted.

The instructions further indicate, “Daily attendance blanks are to be taken from the office by the person opening the room for the day. They are to be left in the room for subsequent entries by other hostesses and turned in to Room 318 when the room is closed.

Take a look at the attendance taken, and list of questions asked about the Fine Arts Room:

Web_WAM_110_FineArts_02.jpg


Hand-done Handsome Things, 1949

Web_HDHT_01.jpgIn order to commemorate the Minnesota Territorial Centennial, the University Gallery exhibited “the most humble object made at home because it had to supply some need, to those objects of great artistry and excellent craftsmanship which would grace any museum in the land.

While no catalog was created for the exhibit titled, “Hand-done Handsome Things,” Gallery Director, Ruth Lawrence, received a donation in order for some of the exhibited works of Minnesota arts and crafts to be photographed. The photos were later compiled into a scrapbook, which is now contained in Box 3 of the WAM archival collection.

In the introduction, Lawrence states, “There is positive value in these objects, not only through their historical implications but also as they may inspire and aid future craftsmen. They can have an indirect or economic value to living craftsmen as well as direct or intrinsic value to the worker himself or to the community…

The East holds the philosophy that the artist is not a special kind of man but every man a special kind of artist. With more leisure time coming this philosophy of the East might well be pondered here.

Ponder over a few of the scrapbook pages containing hand-done handsome things…

Web_HDHT_04.jpg Web_HDHT_05.jpg Web_HDHT_06.jpg WEb_HDHT_07.jpg Web_HDHT_09.jpg Web_HDHT_10.jpg


Jerome Liebling

Upon reading the news of the recent passing of Jerome Liebling, photographer and former U of M art faculty member, I looked back through the WAM Files to see if his work had been featured in an exhibit at the University Gallery.

A folder, titled, “Photography – Jerry Liebling, Feb. 27 – Mar. 21, 1951” was found in Box 3. The folder contents included a catalogue, titled, “A Photographic Document of the Minnesota Scene” and a typed statement from the artist, which includes insights on his art form:

Web_Liebling_01.jpg

Web_Liebling_04.jpg Web_Liebling_05.jpg

The WAM permanent collection contains some of Liebling’s photography, noteably of other U of M art faculty.


The Little Staple Remover That Could

Stapler_01.jpg
Clip. Snap. Pull. Snip.

The little staple remover separated papers that contained private or confidential information. The WAM Files project staple remover was a happy little staple remover for she had such a “jolly load” of confidential materials to separate!

There were University invoices with social security numbers, personnel files with social security numbers, and even reports of grades earned in courses taken… with social security numbers! Then there were photocopies of personal checks – checks for donations, checks for reservations, and checks for libations!

Confidential2_Web.jpg

The little staple remover aids the processor in separating the items containing confidential information, which are then set aside for confidential recycling.

As they have often encountered folders containing papers which are stacked 2 or more inches thick, the processors and the little staple remover are often left thinking…

I think I can… I think I can… I think I can… I think I can…

(Blog post written in the spirit of The Little Engine that Could, by Watty Piper)


Institute of Design Exhibition, 1948

Web_WAM_003_InstituteofDesignEx_1.jpgAnother early look into the composition and content of the exhibit spaces of the University Gallery in Northrop Auditorium is captured in these photos of the Institute of Design Exhibition, held January 26-February 25, 1948.

According to a UM News Release from January 20, 1948 (Digital Conservancy), the exhibit was “a comprehensive exhibition of almost 300 examples of work done by faculty members and students of the Institute of Design in Chicago.

Artists featured in the exhibition included: Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Gyorgy Kepes, Richard Koppe, Serge Chermayeff, George Fred Keck, and Arthur Siegel.

Web_WAM_003_InstituteofDesignEx_2.jpg Web_WAM_003_InstituteofDesignEx_3.jpg

“The Institute of Design in its teaching methods urges free experimentation by students and an analysis of the problems involved in the particular problem concerned.”

 


Bicentennial Bevy

I have previously featured several items that are present within the WAM collection concerning the Bicentennial Exhibition of Minnesota Art and Architecture. Just when I thought I had seen the last trace of any Bicentennial exhibit record – I came across a bevy of related materials that once again increased my intrigue in this exhibition.

Several photographs and negatives (loose or in envelopes) that capture the various stops along the statewide exhibition tour, were found bulging from a folder in Box 100. Upon the sage advice of the Archives staff, negatives were placed in envelopes and photographs were enclosed in protective sheets.

Web_WAM_100_BicentennialPhotos_1.jpg Web_WAM_100_BicentennialPhotos_4.jpg

The photographs document the installation of the traveling exhibit at host sites, capture visitors from local communities enjoying the works on display, and also feature a few choice shots of the “big rig” used to haul the exhibition across the state.

WAM_100_BicentennialPhotos_01_WEB.jpg WAM_100_BicentennialPhotos_02_WEB.jpg
WAM_100_BicentennialPhotos_03.WEB.jpg WAM_100_BicentennialPhotos_06_WEB.jpg



Folk Arts

A September 25, 1984 UM News Release (Digital Conservancy) announced, “Folklorist to Survey Minnesota Arts and Artists”

“If you are the latest in a long line of duck decoy painters, quilters or Slovenian pastry decorators, Willard Moore wants to hear about you. Moore, a Minneapolis folklorist, will conduct a yearlong hunt for Minnesota folk arts and practicing folk artists. The University of Minnesota Art Museum will coordinate and administer the survey, which will begin Oct. 1. Moore, as guest curator, and the museum staff will organize an exhibition and publication on Minnesota folk arts from the material he collects.”

Moore’s hunt brings to light the research involved in creating museum exhibitions. This survey resulted in a book, and the University Art Museum exhibition, “Circles of Tradition: Folk Arts in Minnesota,” held in 1989.

The front and back cover of a promotional material created for the exhibit, found amongst the many boxes of folders that document this exhibition and related programming and events:

Web_WAM_FolkArts_02.jpg Web_WAM_FolkArts_01.jpg